Balekian Hayes P.L.L.C. - Logo
Home 9 Video Transcripts 9 The Key Factors Texas Courts Weigh in Child Custody Decisions

Every custody case is different, but Texas judges tend to look at a consistent set of factors when deciding how to structure conservatorship, possession, and decision-making authority. Understanding what courts actually pay attention to can help parents prepare for what’s ahead and, just as importantly, understand what they can do now to put themselves in the best position later.

The Presumption in Favor of Joint Custody

Texas law generally starts from a presumption in favor of joint managing conservatorship, meaning both parents share legal rights and responsibilities for their child. Courts will typically grant this arrangement unless there is significant evidence suggesting it would be inappropriate, such as evidence of abuse or serious parental unfitness. Once both parents are named joint managing conservators, the conversation shifts to how they will divide decision-making authority over the child’s upbringing.

Because most courts expect joint decision-making, cooperation and communication between parents carry real weight. Judges recognize that children are best served when parents can work together, and a parent who struggles to communicate or cooperate may find that reflected in how the court structures decision-making authority.

This presumption doesn’t mean custody arrangements look identical in every case. Joint managing conservatorship describes shared legal rights and responsibilities, but the actual day-to-day possession schedule, and how specific decisions get divided between the parents, can still vary widely based on the family’s circumstances.

The Child’s Relationship With Each Parent

Judges often try to approximate what a family was already doing before the divorce when deciding custody. Since a judge cannot always know with certainty which parent is telling the full story, courts frequently look at established patterns: who took the child to doctor’s appointments, who attended parent-teacher conferences, and who was present for middle-of-the-night needs when the child was sick. These patterns of involvement tend to carry forward into the court’s custody decision.

For parents who want a meaningful role in raising their children after a divorce, the practical takeaway is that involvement needs to start well before a case is filed. A parent who has been consistently engaged in the day-to-day realities of parenting is in a stronger position when a judge is deciding how to structure custody going forward.

Mental and Physical Health of the Parents

A parent’s mental and physical health can be a factor in custody decisions, though courts approach this carefully. Judges recognize that a person with a mental illness doesn’t always recognize it in themselves, and the court cannot order someone to simply become mentally healthy. What courts can do is impose conditions, such as requiring psychological treatment or medication, as a prerequisite for certain levels of participation in a child’s life or even for visitation itself.

Physical health issues present a similar challenge. Courts are generally reluctant to appear as though they’re punishing a parent for a health condition, but if a physical limitation genuinely affects a parent’s ability to care for a child, the court has to weigh that because the child’s best interest ultimately outweighs other considerations.

Parental Involvement in Decision-Making

When it comes to deciding who has authority over major decisions, like education and medical care, judges again look to what the parties were already doing while married. If one parent was the one who historically made those calls, that pattern often continues into the court’s final decree. Ideally, both parents participate in these decisions by agreement, but when that isn’t possible, the court will designate who has that authority based on the established pattern of involvement.

Does the Child Get a Say?

A child’s own preference can factor into a custody decision, but only to a limited degree. Under Texas law, a child who is 12 years of age or older may share a preference with the judge privately, in chambers. That preference, however, is not binding on the court. A 12-year-old isn’t considered equipped to make a final decision about where to primarily live, so while the law allows the court to consider the child’s input, it remains just one factor among many in the overall custody determination.

How Parents Can Prepare

Because so much of a Texas custody decision comes down to established patterns, rather than promises about how things will be different going forward, the most effective preparation often starts long before any paperwork is filed. Staying involved in the ordinary, unglamorous parts of parenting, homework, medical appointments, daily routines, builds the kind of track record judges look for. Parents who wait until a case is underway to become more involved may find that the court is looking backward at the pattern that already existed, not forward at good intentions.

It also helps to approach the process with a clear head about what the court is actually trying to accomplish. Judges aren’t looking to reward or punish either parent; they’re trying to figure out an arrangement that lets a child maintain stability and strong relationships with both parents wherever that’s possible. Parents who can demonstrate a willingness to cooperate, even amid a difficult divorce, tend to be viewed favorably when it comes to shared decision-making authority.

Putting It All Together

No single factor determines a Texas custody outcome. Instead, judges weigh the presumption toward joint custody, each parent’s established role in the child’s life, health considerations, decision-making history, and, where applicable, the child’s own preference, all together to reach a decision built around the child’s best interest. Because these factors interact in ways that are hard to predict, parents navigating a custody case benefit from understanding how courts are likely to view their specific situation.

If you’re heading into a custody case, whether for the first time or as part of a modification, taking stock of your own involvement, health, and ability to communicate with the other parent is a useful exercise. It won’t tell you exactly how a judge will rule, but it will help you understand where you stand and what to focus on going forward.

Contact Us

From the bottom of my heart, I cannot recommend Balekian Hayes enough. As a father fighting to protect his daughters and secure meaningful protections for our future, I needed more than legal representation — I needed a team that understood what was truly at stake. This firm didn’t just manage my case; they stood beside me while I fought for my children with passion, discipline, and faith. They recognized my effort to always put my girls first and reinforced that commitment at every turn.

Lisa at reception is the heartbeat of this firm. From the very first call, she treated me with sincerity and compassion. On days when I felt overwhelmed or discouraged, Lisa gently reminded me that my faith was evidence and that trials are temporary. She consistently reassured me that everything would work out the way it was meant to. She addressed every concern directly or made sure someone did. Her kindness grounded me more than she probably realizes. She sets the culture — patient, understanding, and steady.

Bryn is one of the hardest working professionals I have ever encountered. She was my go-to throughout the case and handled every detail with empathy, precision, and follow-through. What stood out most was how she consistently reinforced that I was a great father. When doubt crept in, Bryn reminded me that my effort to secure protections for my daughters mattered deeply. She genuinely cared about the outcome, not just legally but personally. Her calm strength made some of the hardest moments feel manageable.

And then there is Emory. Emory is exceptional. Her knowledge and strategic leadership transformed our case and ultimately led to a strong victory for my family. But what separates her is her empathy. She saw my pain. She recognized the weight I was carrying as a father trying to do everything right. On days when I questioned whether I was doing enough, Emory consistently reminded me that I was doing amazing — even when I didn’t feel like my best self. She pointed out the victories I had already achieved before she and her team ever stepped in. That perspective restored my confidence. “Relax — we’ve got this,” she would say, these struggles may feel like loses right now, but soon they will be your victories— and she meant it. She fought fiercely for the protections my daughters deserved while also protecting me emotionally through the process.

This firm was the greatest blessing of my year. To the fathers out there: I know how heavy this road can feel. But when you have Balekian Hayes in your corner, the burden truly lifts. They honor your role. They fight for your family. They believe in you when you need it most.

Personally, I know what it feels like to lie awake at night wondering if you’re doing enough… if you’re going to protect your children… if the system will truly see your heart. I lived it. As a father fighting for my daughters and the protections they deserve, I needed more than legal advice — I needed a team that understood what was truly at stake. From day one, Balekian Hayes saw my passion, my effort, and my unwavering commitment to put my girls first. They didn’t just represent me or defend me in court — they strengthened me as a father. Without hesitation, I can say this firm was the greatest blessing of my year.
–
To my team I am beyond thankful for your effort, thank you all so much for these blessings we get to live.

If you’re praying for help — this is your sign. Make the call.

John

“Dedicated lawyers who will work hard and fight for you. Kris and Justin went above and beyond in my case. A big thanks to both of them. I would not hesitate to recommend.”

Dustin

“Balekian Hayes is the best law firm I’ve ever had the pleasure of doing business with. Very happy with everything!”

Travis

“I had a fantastic experience with Balekian Hayes law firm and highly recommend them. I initially met with Kris in 2007 regarding a potential divorce. She immediately knew what an emotionally challenging and stressful time this was going to be for me and didn’t want me to be alone during this journey. She helped me plan effectively to protect myself, my financial future, and my time with my kids. I interviewed several attorneys prior to meeting her, but none had the compassion and law knowledge combination that she and her team did. Hiring her was one of the best decisions I’ve ever made.”

Elizabeth

“Ms. Hayes was not only an excellent attorney throughout the duration of my case, but counseled me through some very tough financial decisions and marital obstacles outside of litigation. We forged a friendship that will last well beyond our professional relationship and I was blessed to have her on my side.”

Previous Client

“She was and continues to be professional, caring, and honest.
Ms. Balekian Hayes is a bulldog who fights for what’s best for the child.”

– Krystal